top of page
Search

It starts with leaders making space for professional judgement.

Prue Pisani
Jun 24
2 min read

The best school improvement work I’ve seen has never started with a 'program'. It started with leaders making space for professional judgement.


Over many years, I have seen schools approach new programs in very different ways. In some places, a program lands as though everything that came before it needs to be swept away. The message may not be intended that way, but that is often how it feels to teachers: what you knew, what you built and what you were doing well is suddenly treated as less valuable.


In stronger implementation cultures, the work feels different. Leaders do not rush from problem to program. They create the conditions for teachers to look carefully at student learning, examine current practice, and work out how a new program or approach might support improvement. The program may bring structure, clarity and useful resources, but it does not replace professional judgement.


That judgement matters when implementing something in context. Teachers and leaders still need to decide which elements to implement first, what has to be adapted to meet the needs of their learners, what should be protected in their existing practice and what level of support is needed so the work can be done well.


Without that, even a strong program can become another compliance exercise. With it, the work is more likely to feel steady, purposeful and connected to what students and teachers actually need.


One practical starting point for leaders is to get closer to the work without turning it into an audit. Visit classrooms. Sit in planning conversations, just listening. Talk with teachers about what they are noticing. Then ask: what is the next small step you can see that would make learning clearer, tighter or more effective for students?


That question matters because real improvement is often less about finding the one right answer and more about making better decisions, more often, closer to the work. It is the careful adjustment of explanations, scaffolds, tasks, the lesson focus, the way in which its differentiated and feedback. It is the cumulative impact of skilled educators paying attention and refining practice over time.


There is no silver bullet. But there is professional judgement, used collectively and deliberately, in the service of student learning.


What have you seen leaders do that helps schools implement change steadily, without pulling the rug out from under teachers?



 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page